LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH CENTER
File #: 20-814    Name:
Type: Public Hearings Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 7/1/2020 In control: Planning Commission
On agenda: 7/9/2020 Final action: 7/9/2020
Title: Public hearing, consideration, and possible action regarding PUD-313 (Planned Unit Development), Stoney Ridge Estates, RM (Residential Multi-Family) to RM (Residential Multi-Family)/PUD-313, located one-quarter north of Kenosha Street (71st Street), one-quarter mile west of 9th Street (Lynn Lane), south of the Broken Arrow Expressway
Attachments: 1. 2-CASE MAP, 2. 3-Aerial, 3. 4-Design Statement, 4. 5-Exhibits
Broken Arrow Planning Commission
07-09-2020

To: Chairman and Commission Members
From: Development Services Department
Title:
title
Public hearing, consideration, and possible action regarding PUD-313 (Planned Unit Development), Stoney Ridge Estates, RM (Residential Multi-Family) to RM (Residential Multi-Family)/PUD-313, located one-quarter north of Kenosha Street (71st Street), one-quarter mile west of 9th Street (Lynn Lane), south of the Broken Arrow Expressway
End

Background:
Applicant: Wallace Engineering
Owner: Matt & Susan Brown Trust
Developer: Matt & Susan Brown Trust
Engineer: Wallace Engineering
Location: One-quarter mile north of Kenosha Street, one-quarter mile west of 9th Street, and south of the Broken Arrow Expressway
Size of Tract 6.53 acres
Present Zoning: RM
Proposed Zoning: RM/PUD-313
Comp Plan: Level 3 (Transition Area)

Planned Unit Development (PUD)-313 involves a 6.53-acre lot located one-quarter quarter mile north of Kenosha Street, one-quarter mile west of 9th Street, and south of the Broken Arrow Expressway. The property has been platted as Lot 6, Block 2, Stonecrest Addition and remains undeveloped.

The applicant is developing the property as an age-restricted (senior tenants), four-story apartment building. Due to the cost of constructing an elevator, the applicant is requesting to increase the maximum length of the building to facilitate the use of one elevator system. The topography of the site makes perimeter fencing on the north and west sides of the development difficult. The ground surface elevation along the west boundary is approximately 25-feet higher than the proposed parking lot. Constructing a fence along this boundary would require extensive grading and the removal of the existing tree line, which would disrupt neighboring properties. The north boundary is approximately 8-feet below the proposed parking lot, thus 6 to 8-foot fence would not be sufficient to screen the development from the Broken Arrow ...

Click here for full text