LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH CENTER
File #: 19-1396    Name:
Type: General Business Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 11/12/2019 In control: Broken Arrow City Council
On agenda: 11/18/2019 Final action:
Title: Consideration, discussion, and possible approval of PUD-294 (Planned Unit Development) and BAZ-2036 (Rezoning), Spring Creek Plaza, 13.78 acres, CG (Commercial General) and R-2 (Single-Family Residential) to PUD-294/CH (Commercial Heavy), located south and east of the southeast corner of Tucson Street (121st Street) and Elm Place (161st East Avenue)
Attachments: 1. 2-CASE MAP, 2. 3-Aerial, 3. 4-PUD-294 & BAZ-2036 DESIGN STATEMENT, 4. 5-Letter of Protest from neighboring property to Planning Commission, 5. 6-Letter of Protest from neighboring property to City Council
Broken Arrow City Council
Meeting of: 11-18-2019

Title:
title
Consideration, discussion, and possible approval of PUD-294 (Planned Unit Development) and BAZ-2036 (Rezoning), Spring Creek Plaza, 13.78 acres, CG (Commercial General) and R-2 (Single-Family Residential) to PUD-294/CH (Commercial Heavy), located south and east of the southeast corner of Tucson Street (121st Street) and Elm Place (161st East Avenue)

End

Background:
Planned Unit Development (PUD)-294 involves a 13.78-acre parcel located south and east of the southeast corner of Tucson Street (121st Street) and Elm Place (161st East Avenue). The property is presently zoned CG (Commercial General) and R-2 (Single-Family Residential). In conjunction with PUD-294, applicant has submitted BAZ-2036, a request to change the underlying zoning from CG and R-2 to CH (Commercial Heavy).
PUD-196, BAZ-1823, and SP-231 were approved by the City Council on February 17, 2009. BAZ-1823 requested to change the zoning on the property from CG and R-2 to CH. The development was proposed to have mini-storage and indoor RV storage which required a specific use permit to be approved on the property. These requests were approved subject to the property being platted but no plat was completed for the development and thus the PUD has expired.
With PUD-294, the applicant is proposing a development which contains retail, restaurant, office, indoor RV storage, and mini storage. PUD-294 is very similar in context and design with the previously approved PUD-196. The main difference being that PUD-196 proposed a street through the development, where PUD-294 designates that general area for a drainage channel. PUD-294 is also more restrictive of permitted uses in Tracts C and D.
In the meeting of October 24, 2019, the Planning Commission recommended approval (5-0 vote) of PUD-294 and BAZ-2036 per Staff recommendation with two added requirements. The first requirement is to state in the PUD that no semi-truck parking will be all...

Click here for full text