LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH CENTER
File #: 19-1272    Name:
Type: General Business Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/4/2019 In control: Broken Arrow City Council
On agenda: 10/15/2019 Final action:
Title: Consideration, discussion, and possible termination of purchase contract previously awarded to Rush Trucking Company for the purchase of one (1) Articulating Aerial Device and Truck Chassis with Utility Body, and authorization to re-bid the purchase
Attachments: 1. Bid Tab 19.107, 2. Supporting Correspondence
Date Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Broken Arrow City Council
Meeting of: 10-15-2019

Title:
title
Consideration, discussion, and possible termination of purchase contract previously awarded to Rush Trucking Company for the purchase of one (1) Articulating Aerial Device and Truck Chassis with Utility Body, and authorization to re-bid the purchase
End

Background:
On August 21, 2018, The Broken Arrow City Council awarded a contract to Rush Trucking Center for the purchase of one (1) Articulating Aerial Device and Truck Chassis with Utility Body for the Traffic Signals Division of the Streets and Stormwater Department.
Rush Trucking Company was awarded the contract, even though they were the 2nd lowest bidder, for the reason that they offered a shorter delivery time then the lowest bidder by over 100 days. The current Traffic Division truck that is recommended to be replaced has had a variety of maintenance issues, needing approximately $18,000 for repairs. Staff felt it was worth spending the difference of $3,945 between the low bidder and the 2nd lowest bidder to expedite the delivery of the truck. According to the bid tabulation sheet, the delivery time of 180-240 days would have given the department a delivery date of approximately April 25, 2019, therefore staff recommended that Rush Trucking Company be awarded the bid.
Once it was determined that Rush Trucking Company could not deliver this vehicle on time as stated in their bid, staff requested a credit of $3,945, which was the difference between the low bid and their bid. Rush Trucking Company agreed to only credit $2,500 of the requested $3,945.
Rush Trucking Company has failed to perform this contract based upon time of delivery and the department has yet to take delivery of the vehicle. It has also come to our attention of the department, that the vehicle was damaged during the process of installing the bed for this unit. The department has an obligation to be good stewards of tax dollars and therefore, staff does not believe it is ...

Click here for full text